Hi!
Everything is explaned correct so far... 
I have one addition: You can also allow the map developer to set his own textures by let him enter userID and subID directly as start parameters. On the other hand, such a repaint feature, but included in LOTUS like vehicle repaints, is planned already.
Also, I have one more question: Am I able to create my own font for the existing modules or is that not possible?
Sorry, but currently, that's not possible, perhaps later!
I mean the inside single-line ones which are part of the base content with the GT6N.
And the standard IBIS computer display for that tram as well.
OK, since we've made this font, please tell us, which letters do you missing. What's about the outer matrix flip dot?
They have to be added manually to the fonts... the best way would be contacting the authors of the original fonts that they add them to their font. Which fonts should get these letters? Do you mean the LCD outside displays, which are used by the ND313? Or the inside LCDs?
Well...
6.) You give him the wayindex, but not the timetable index (you got at line 4)
9.) You give him a "0" as templistindex... do your really want to do that? It means that you will everytime get the information of the first trip of the tour!
15/16: If you would like to have an array with n entries, that you have to use SetLength(stn_name, n), but let the for-loop run from 0 to n-1 !
The same principle: In this case, the list is created by TimetableGenerateTempTripListByTour
Ah!
Before using that function, you have to generate a station list with TimetableGenerateTempStnListByTrip. After doing that, you get the count of entries by the function TimetableGetTempStnListCount.
After that, the templistindex is just the index of the "line" of this list you would like to get access. 
To be sure, tell me please, which function you mean.
Are your sure, there are no extreme tiny or invalid polygons in the mesh but really only these four vertices and this one rectangle?
And what does happen, if you place the spline for itself, without adding it to an existing curbstone or something like that?
It makes it WORSE??? The exact opposite of what you wrote?
If there is no polygone, the wireframe ist much more rough than if you place a polygone. So even if the polygone has the same height, it could be more bumpy because there are more edges between your curbstones...
One important fact is perhaps, that (in contrast to the splines, polygons etc.) the railtracks have an absolute height in any case! So even if you don't mind the height of polygons or splines, you have to pay attention to or have to correct the height of your tracks!
Perhaps you should take a look into this article: https://www.lotus-simulator.de…ain-subgrades-railtracks/
Especially because we will do performance optimation in the next time, I cannot tell you anything about how this would behave in future... A workaround COULD be to enlarge the bounding box. But when there will be collisions, this could lead to strange effects...
Ooohh, I did not see the wood for the trees... If an object emits a shadow depends (currently) on its size! And the "working" pole is larger than the "erroneous" pole!
Sometimes you get this message also in case of Steam is updating your workshop items. Could this have happened?
Oh no, I forgot to tell you adding also the "Export" directory (but I don't need the backup subdirectories), otherwise I cannot open it!
Sorry to have kept you waiting! 
Create it as a standard spline (construct it relative to the rail top edge). If your texture loops in both directions (X and Y), you can try "Global texture size" starting with "1" (Tab Selected Mesh). In this case, it could look better in switch or crossing areas.
OK, then please try removing all kinds of combinations between all configuration items (animations, sounds, otions etc.)...
Currently, I cannot say more than this feature is not planned yet...
Well, yes, ok, just do it!
hmmmm... then I don't know why this could happen... does anyone else have this problem? 
OK, please check also all general settings of your object, perhaps there are differences?
